RECHERCHE:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Ford Grand C-MAX

Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 TDCI 'Trend', LHD


OCCUPANT ADULTE

OCCUPANT ENFANT

PIÉTONS

AIDE À LA SÉCÚRITÉ


 

RÉSULTATS DES TESTS

Ford Grand C-MAX

Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 TDCI 'Trend', LHD


OCCUPANT ADULTE

OCCUPANT ENFANT

PIÉTONS

AIDE À LA SÉCÚRITÉ
Total 35 pts | 96%
Tête: Très bon, Cou: Très bon, Poitrine Bon, La jambe droite Haut: Très bon, Cuisse gauche: Très bon, En bas à droite la jambe: Bon, Lower leg left: Très bon, Pied droit: Très bon, Pied gauche: Très bon
CHOC FRONTAL
15.5 pts
Tête: Très bon, Poitrine Très bon, Abdomen: Très bon, Bassin: Très bon
CHOC LATÉRAL VOITURE
8.0 pts
CHOC LATÉRAL POTEAU
7.4 pts
Cou: Très bon

Total 40 pts | 81%
PERFORMANCES
11.6 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
Enfant de 18 mois
SiègeRömer Baby safe plus
Groupe0, 0+
Sensarrière
Installationancrages et support ISOFIX

PERFORMANCES
12.0 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
Enfant de 3 ans
SiègeRömer Duo plus
Groupe1
Sensavant
Installationancrages ISOFIX et sangle Top Tether

CARACTÉRISTIQUES DE LA VOITURE
4.0 pts
Voir les commentaires
Total 18 pts | 50%
Protection des piétons

TÉTE
13.0 pts
BASSIN
0.9 pts
JAMBE
4.0 pts


Total 5 pts | 71%
DISPOSITIFS DE LIMITATION DE VITESSE
0.0 pts
CONTRÔLE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE STABILITÉ
3.0 pts
RAPPEL DE BOUCLAGE DE CEINTURE
2.0 pts
conducteur
passager
0


Détails du véhicule testé

Caractéristiques techniques
Modèle testé Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 TDCI 'Trend', LHD
Type de carrosserie 5 portes monospace
Année de publication 2010
Poids à vide 1504kg
N° d’identification du véhicule (NIV) à partir duquel s’applique la note Applicable à toutes les applies Grand C-MAX de mêmes caractéristiques testées
Classe PETIT MONOSPACE
Équipement de sécurité
Prétendeurs des ceintures avant
Limiteurs de charge des ceintures avant
Airbag frontal conducteur à un temps
Airbag frontal passager avant à un temps
Airbags latéraux thorax
Airbags latéraux tête


Commentaires (Seulement disponible en anglais)

Adult occupant
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the front passengers' knees and femurs. Additional tests demonstrated that similar protection would be offered to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. The car scored maximum points in the side barrier impact, all body regions being well protected. In the more severe side pole test, protection of most body regions was again good, and that of the chest was adequate. Protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was good.

Child occupant
Based on dummy readings in the impact tests, the car scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year infant. Forward movement of the head was not excessive in the frontal impact and the dummy was properly contained within the protective shell of its restraint in the side impact, as was the 18 month dummy. A switch is available as an option which disables the passenger airbag, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. The test cars were not equipped with the switch and no assessment was done. The dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag were not clearly indicated.

Pedestrian
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs in most of the area tested, but was poor in others. The front edge of the bonnet was predominantly poor. In most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet offered good levels of protection. However, the protection offered to the head of an adult was rated as poor for most of the areas tested.

Safety assist
Electronic stability control is fitted as standard equipment on all variants. The front seats have a seatbelt reminder system as standard. A driver-set speed limitation device is available as an option.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACTEZ-NOUS