RECHERCHE:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Nissan Micra

Nissan Micra 1.2 'Visia', LHD


OCCUPANT ADULTE

OCCUPANT ENFANT

PIÉTONS

AIDE À LA SÉCÚRITÉ


 

RÉSULTATS DES TESTS

Nissan Micra

Nissan Micra 1.2 'Visia', LHD


OCCUPANT ADULTE

OCCUPANT ENFANT

PIÉTONS

AIDE À LA SÉCÚRITÉ
Total 30 pts | 84%
Tête: Très bon, Cou: Très bon, Poitrine Bon, La jambe droite Haut: Moyen, Cuisse gauche: Moyen, En bas à droite la jambe: Bon, Lower leg left: Très bon, Pied droit: Très bon, Pied gauche: Très bon
CHOC FRONTAL
12.7 pts
Tête: Très bon, Poitrine Bon, Abdomen: Très bon, Bassin: Très bon
CHOC LATÉRAL VOITURE
7.7 pts
CHOC LATÉRAL POTEAU
7.1 pts
Cou: Moyen

Total 39 pts | 79%
PERFORMANCES
11.8 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
Enfant de 18 mois
SiègeFair G0/1 S with rearwardfacing Isofix base
Groupe0, 0+
Sensarrière
Installationancrages et support ISOFIX

PERFORMANCES
12.0 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
Enfant de 3 ans
SiègeRömer Duo Plus, Isofix, Top Tether
Groupe1
Sensavant
Installationancrages ISOFIX et sangle Top Tether

CARACTÉRISTIQUES DE LA VOITURE
3.0 pts
Voir les commentaires
Total 21 pts | 58%
Protection des piétons

TÉTE
13.4 pts
BASSIN
1.6 pts
JAMBE
6.0 pts


Total 4 pts | 57%
DISPOSITIFS DE LIMITATION DE VITESSE
0.0 pts
CONTRÔLE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE STABILITÉ
3.0 pts
RAPPEL DE BOUCLAGE DE CEINTURE
1.0 pts
conducteur
0


Détails du véhicule testé

Caractéristiques techniques
Modèle testé Nissan Micra 1.2 'Visia', LHD
Type de carrosserie 5 portes deux volume
Année de publication 2010
Poids à vide 945kg
N° d’identification du véhicule (NIV) à partir duquel s’applique la note MDHFBUK13U0027824
Classe SUPERMINI
Équipement de sécurité
Prétendeurs des ceintures avant
Limiteurs de charge des ceintures avant
Airbag frontal conducteur
Airbag frontal passager avant
Airbags latéraux thorax
Airbags latéraux tête


Commentaires (Seulement disponible en anglais)

Adult occupant
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the front seat occupants. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and protection for the knee/femur/pelvis body region was rated as marginal. In the side barrier impact, protection of most body regions was rated as good. Dummy readings for the chest were also good but the car was penalised for loading the dummy in an unrealistic way, and the protection was rated as fair. In the more sever side pole test, dummy readings of rib deflection indicated marginal protection of the chest. Protection of the neck against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was rated as marginal.

Child occupant
Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The dangers of using a child seat in that seat without first disabling the airbag are clearly indicated on labels in the car.

Pedestrian
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection offered to pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bumper offered marginal protection in most areas tested. Good protection was provided by the bonnet in most areas where the head of child might strike However, predominantly poor protection was provided in those areas likely to by struck by an adult's head.

Safety assist
Electronic stability control is standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the driver's seat. A driver-set speed limitation device is fitted to equipment grades other than the 'Visia' cars assessed.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACTEZ-NOUS